๐Ÿš€ Is It AI? Extension 2.0 is here! Completely rebuilt with Chrome's Side Panel, one-click sign-in, automatic history sync, and usage tracking at a glance. Faster, cleaner, and works on more sites than ever. Add to Chrome โ†’

Analysis by Is It AI?

UFO Appears In Video

This image appears to be a screenshot of a mobile social media feed, likely showing a short-form video. The main visual content features a large, light-colored, disc-shaped unidentified flying object (UFO) hovering against a clear, light blue sky. Overlaying the video content are social media interface elements, including like, comment, and share icons with corresponding counts. A small portion of a person's face is visible in the lower left corner, suggesting a reaction video or selfie mode. The overall composition, including the subject matter and the presence of interface elements, indicates this image is Human generated.

UFO Appears In Video

Why this verdict can be trusted

95%+ Detection accuracy on independent benchmarks
10+ AI generators detected, including the latest
Millions Labeled images used to train the detection models
Detects:
Midjourney DALL-E 3 Stable Diffusion Nano Banana ChatGPT Image Adobe Firefly FLUX Ideogram Kling AI Sora

What we analyzed

We classified this image as likely human-made with 68% confidence.

How Is It AI? classifies images

Is It AI? uses deep-learning models trained on millions of labeled images, spanning both camera-captured photographs and outputs from contemporary generators like Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Nano Banana, Flux, and others. The models analyze each image for pixel-level artifacts, frequency-domain noise patterns, and generator-specific signatures that the human eye typically misses.

The result is a probabilistic detection signal, not absolute proof. For high-stakes decisions like newsroom verification, fraud investigation, or evidence review, combine it with source verification, metadata review, reverse image search, and human judgement.

Common signs of human-made images

Camera-captured photographs tend to carry physical fingerprints that AI models still struggle to reproduce. Common cues:

  • Natural skin texture with visible pores, fine asymmetry, and stray hairs
  • Consistent lighting, shadows, and reflections that match a single light source
  • Lens-specific artifacts: chromatic aberration, vignetting, sensor noise
  • Sharpness that falls off with depth-of-field, not uniformly across the frame
  • EXIF metadata that survived (when available) showing camera, lens, and capture date

These are heuristics, not guarantees. A skilled retoucher or a newer generator can defeat any single cue. Always cross-check.

About this result

A detection signal, not a verdict. Combine with source checks for high-impact decisions. Published by a user. Results are private by default on IsItAi.com.

About public detection results

Get your own AI detection report

Free account: monthly checks, full history, and the option to publish results like this one.